Legal Opinion

Mabb v. Stewart

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1905No. L.A. No. 1371PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This case was before this court upon a former appeal, in which a judgment for the. plaintiff and an order denying a new trial were reversed. (Mabb v. Stewart, 133 Cal. 556, [65 Pac. 1085].) The cause was again tried and judgment given for the plaintiff, from which and from an order denying his motion for a new trial the defendant again appeals. The plaintiff J. J. Mabb has no interest in the case except as husband of his co-plaintiff.

The transcript is voluminous, but the case in its main features is simple. It is an action to recover damages caused to the plaintiff’s orange and lemon orchard…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillon v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Mabb v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Green v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API