Mabb v. Stewart
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
—Plaintiffs, husband and wife, allege that they were the owners of ten acres of land in the Ontario Colony, and the owners of ten shares of water stock of the San Antonio Water Company; that by virtue of their ownership of this water stock they were entitled, for use upon their land, to a certain amount of water, supplied by the San Antonio Water Company. This water was divided amongst the shareholders of the San Antonio Water Company, in proportion to the number of their shares, and to the amount of water which, from time to time, the company had available for the purpose of distribution.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. ScurrMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. VereneseneckockockhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Morris v. LachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Unfried v. LibertIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Mabb v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Parra v. CleaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Roberts v. KraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.