Legal Opinion

Levy & Devaney, Inc. v. International Pocketbook Workers Union

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 16, 1932PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The plaintiff is a manufacturing corporation operating a plant in Bridgeport which it has at all times conducted as an open shop, employing both union and non-union help. Shortly after the plaintiff began business in Bridgeport, the defendant Union opened negotiations in an effort to induce it to unionize its factory, and upon its failure to do so called a strike in the factory, the only issue between the plaintiff and the defendant Union being the right of the former to maintain an open shop. Prior to the calling of the strike, the plaintiff had in its employ about sixty-five men and women…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fenske Bros. v. Upholsterers International Union of North America, Local No. 18Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Steiner v. Long Beach Local No. 128California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Brainard v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Scofes v. HelmarIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API