Legal Opinion
Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 14, 1983No. 11752PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiff in this case is the Hartford Division of Emhart Industries, Inc. (Emhart). Emhart operates a manufacturing plant located in Windsor. The defendant, Local 376 of the International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (union), is the certified bargaining representative of Emhart’s employees. There are also six individually named defendants. Philip Wheeler, James Bowen and Robert Madore are all officers of the union; Wheeler is president, while Bowen and Madore are the business agents for the union. Joseph Belliveau, Felix Velez and…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.