Legal Opinion

Smith v. Clinton

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided May 16, 1988No. Civ. A. LR-C-88-29PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this case is whether at-large voting for two seats in the Arkansas House of Representatives from dual-member District 48-49 in Crittenden County denies black voters an equal opportunity to participate in the political process, in violation of section 2 et seq. of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq. 1

We have made a careful, practical assessment of the impact of the challenged multi-member structure, “in the light of past and present reality, political and otherwise.” See White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755, 769-70, 93 S.Ct. 2332,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Perkins v. City of West HelenaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bizzell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Red Clay Consolidated School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Ruiz v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Jeffers v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1990
  4. Sanchez v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Clarke v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API