Legal Opinion
Bizzell v. White
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 21, 1982No. 81-159PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs, citizens and taxpayers of this state, brought this original action in the Supreme Court of Arkansas pursuant to Amendment 45 § 5, which amends Art. 8, as amended by Amendment 23, of the Constitution of Arkansas (1874). The action is against Frank White, Paul Riviere and Steve Clark in their respective capacities of Governor, Secretary of State and Attorney General, who constitute the membership of the Board of Apportionment. The complaint challenged the composition of Senate District 7 as approved by the Board of Apportionment with the Governor dissenting. Plaintiffs allege…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. TawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Faubus v. KinneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Jones v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1988
- Duennenberg v. City of BarlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Taylor v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Stack v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Taylor v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984