Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 2004PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Cross-appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming modification under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 raise issues of imputed income. We affirm.

Claimant, Jerry Burrell, was employed as a compressor operator. Between December 1997 and June 1998, he sustained two groin injuries caused by work-related lifting. By agreement, Claimant received workers’ compensation benefits.

Employer, Philadelphia Gas Works and CompServices, Inc., filed various petitions seeking to end or limit benefits. 2 During the litigation before…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. South Hills Health System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Lucey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Caso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. School District of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Kleinhagan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Brewer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Allegis Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API