Burrell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Cross-appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming modification under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 raise issues of imputed income. We affirm.
Claimant, Jerry Burrell, was employed as a compressor operator. Between December 1997 and June 1998, he sustained two groin injuries caused by work-related lifting. By agreement, Claimant received workers’ compensation benefits.
Employer, Philadelphia Gas Works and CompServices, Inc., filed various petitions seeking to end or limit benefits. 2 During the litigation before…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- South Hills Health System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Lucey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Caso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rosenberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- School District of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Kleinhagan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Brewer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Allegis Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.