Rosenberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
This appeal from the modification of workers’ compensation benefits again raises the question of an employer’s responsibility to prove whether or not it has a position available to a partially disabled claimant. We determine that the fact-finder failed to address a crucial conflict in *246evidence on this issue. Accordingly, we vacate and remand.
Colleen Rosenberg (Claimant) was employed by Pike County (Employer) as a corrections officer when, in January 2002, she suffered an injury to her right knee from which she has not recovered. However, she returned to light duty work…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Minicozzi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- South Hills Health System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Burrell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Kleinhagan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Reichert v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.