Legal Opinion

School District of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 2015No. 34 EAP 2014PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether Section 306(b)(3) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 requires an employer to provide an injured employee with written “notice of ability to return to work” before offering alternative employment where the injured employee has not yet filed a claim petition and, thus, has never proven entitlement to workers’ compensation benefits. We hold that Section 306(b)(3) notice is required where the employer is seeking to modify existing workers’ compensation benefits based on medical evidence establishing that the injured employee is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. S. Sloane v. WCAB (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. L. Sarmiento-Hernandez v. WCAB (Ace American Insurance Company)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Northtec, LLC and American Zurich Insurance Co. v. WCAB (Skaria)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API