Kropf v. City of Sterling Heights
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P. J.
Plaintiffs are purchasers of an irregularly shaped parcel of land, some ten acres in area, located within the City of Sterling Heights. The parcel in question is zoned exclu*24sively for single-family residential dwellings. The present action arises out of plaintiffs’ efforts to have the zoning ordinance declared unconstitutional as to their property and to have their property rezoned for multiple residential purposes. Upon trial of this cause, the trial judge found that plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate the nonsuitability of their property for single-family use and dismissed their complaint.
P…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Biske v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Gust v. Township of CantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Roll v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Township of West Bloomfield v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Palmer v. Township of SuperiorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ottawa County Farms, Inc v. Polkton TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Binkowski v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.