Legal Opinion
Wetsel v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 14, 1953No. Civ. 8469PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Petitioners filed in this court a verified petition for a writ staying further proceedings in the respond- . ent superior court until the validity of the entry of the said Keith V. 0 ’Leary and Donald K. Moore on the real property described in said complaint and their claim of right or title thereto as a placer mining claim shall be finally determined by the United States of America.
The petition alleged in substance as follows:
That one O’Leary and one Moore were holders of an unpatented placer mining claim to the land in controversy; by a contract between petitioners and the United States,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Johnson v. DrewSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Merritt & Bourne v. Judd & ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Gage v. GuntherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Chittim v. Belle Fourche Bentonite Products Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Crowder v. LyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Monolith Portland Cement Co. v. GillberghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954