Monolith Portland Cement Co. v. Gillbergh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MOSK, J. pro tem. *
This appeal from a judgment of dismissal, entered following the sustaining of respondents’ demurrers without leave to amend and the granting of respondents’ motion to dismiss, involves a conflict between a purported mining locator claiming rights under the general mining laws (30 U.S.C.A. § 22 et seq.) and a lessee under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C.A. § 181 et seq.).
Appellant is a manufacturer of cement and uses the mineral gypsum in its manufacturing process. At various dates during the decade following September 1, 1938, appellant filed locations on seven…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Orchard v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.