Legal Opinion

Monolith Portland Cement Co. v. Gillbergh

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1954No. Civ. 20138Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOSK, J. pro tem. *

This appeal from a judgment of dismissal, entered following the sustaining of respondents’ demurrers without leave to amend and the granting of respondents’ motion to dismiss, involves a conflict between a purported mining locator claiming rights under the general mining laws (30 U.S.C.A. § 22 et seq.) and a lessee under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C.A. § 181 et seq.).

Appellant is a manufacturer of cement and uses the mineral gypsum in its manufacturing process. At various dates during the decade following September 1, 1938, appellant filed locations on seven…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Orchard v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API