Legal Opinion

Chittim v. Belle Fourche Bentonite Products Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1944No. 2274, 2278PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Riner, Justice

The plaintiffs, May Chittim, and her husband Charles B. Chittim, Virginia Z. Hejde, and her husband Francis Hejde, in this review proceeding No. 2274, appellants, brought suit in the District Court of Crook County, Wyoming, against the Belle Fourche Bentonite Products Company, as defendant and respondent here, to quiet their title to certain bentonite placer mining claims located in said county. The plaintiffs, who will usually be thus designated hereinafter, alleged that the' defendant, a South Dakota corporation, and subsequently referred to, for convenience, as the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Security Co. v. Panhandle National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. McCombs v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Peterson v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Railway Co. v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rasmussen Drilling, Inc., a Colorado Corporation Licensed to Do Business in Wyoming v. Kerr-Mcgee Nuclear Corporation and Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Schaffer v. Standard Timber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Strom v. FeltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Miller Land & Mineral Co. v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. v. BruchWyoming Supreme Court · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API