O'Connell v. Reed
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to tlie Circuit Court of tlie United States for tlie District of Kansas.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
On December 4, 1891, Simon Reed and Thomas Murdoch, the defendants in error and the plaintiffs below, who were citizens of Illinois, brought an action in the circuit court for the district of Kansas against T. J. O’Connell, the plaintiff in error, who was a citizen of Kansas, for $2,239.70, for goods sold and delivered. Their petition contained two counts,— one for $338.71, then due, and the other for $1,900.99, not due. The defendant demurred to the petition on the grounds (1) that the court had no jurisdiction of the defendant, or of the subject of the action; (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- NUDD v. Burrows, AssigneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Van Doren v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899
- Bowden v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Yates v. Whyel Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Times Pub. Co. v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.