Yates v. Whyel Coke Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; William D. Day, Judge. Action by the Whyel Coke Company against J. V. N. Yates. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
The contract made on March 15, 1910, with the Pickands-Magee Company by the plaintiff in error (who will hereinafter be called the defendant), obligated him as purchaser to accept weekly for the residue of the calendar year not less than 15 nor more than 20 cars of “selected 72-hour Ellen foundry coke,” delivered “f. o. b. cars at ovens of party of the first part.” Each month’s deliveries were to be treated as a separate and independent contract. The Pickands-Alagee Company is claimed by it and the defendant in error (who will hereinafter be called the plaintiff) to have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Preston v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1861
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Utility Battery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Catlettsburg, KY. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Arrington v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Avellanet v. Porto Rican Express Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.