Times Pub. Co. v. Carlisle
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error í o the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. These were three actions for libel. The defendant In error, Harold Carlisle, was a merchant, living with his wife, in Kansas City, in the state of Missouri, where he had resided for more than two years, on February 20, 1897. He was 44 years old, and had a good reputation for honesty and integrity.
Read the full summary
In Error í o the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. These were three actions for libel. The defendant In error, Harold Carlisle, was a merchant, living with his wife, in Kansas City, in the state of Missouri, where he had resided for more than two years, on February 20, 1897. He was 44 years old, and had a good reputation for honesty and integrity. He was engaged with one Peters, under the firm name of Carlisle & Peters, In trade in gents’ furnishing goods, at 818 Main street, in Kansas City. He was horn m England, and came to this country in 1879. He had…
1Opinion of the CourtSanborn, Circuit Judge
“A good name is rather to- be chosen than great riches, and loving favor rather than silver and gold.” The respect and esteem of his fellows are among the highest rewards of a well-spent life vouchsafed to man in this existence. The hope of them is the inspiration of Ms youth, and their possession the solace of Ms later years. A man of affairs, a business man, who, has been seen and known of Ms fellowmen in the active pursuits of life for many years, and who has developed a good character a,nd an unblemished reputation, has secured a possession more useful and more valuable than lands, or…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Sunderland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Henderson v. DreyfusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Colbert v. Journal Publishing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Adler v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.