Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social Services Ex Rel. B.H.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 2011No. 25672PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Petitioner (Father) filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal termination of his parental rights under SDCL chapter 26-8A. Father’s appeal was dismissed because the original notice of appeal did not contain his signature as required by SDCL 15-26A-4. Father now petitions this Court to reinstate his appeal. A signed notice of appeal accompanied the petition for reinstatement. Because the signing requirement of SDCL 15-26A-4 is jurisdictional and jurisdictional requirements cannot be waived, the petition for reinstatement is denied.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] In this abuse and neglect…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Becker v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. v. Rock Creek FarmsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Smith v. Rustic Home Builders, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Ries v. Jm Custom Homes, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of MurphySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.