Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rustic Home Builders, LLC

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2013No. 26534PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] We address the question whether an LLC must be represented by an attorney on appeal.

Background

[¶ 2.] Rustic Home Builders, LLC, contracted with Michael and Maggie Smith to provide the Smiths with specialty lumber products, services, and log home supplies for constructing a home north of Flan-dreau. Disagreements eventually led to a lawsuit. On May 1, 2007, the Smiths obtained a default judgment against Rustic for $174,963.01. Although Jay Driesen, Rustic’s manager, and Jared Driesen were listed as individual defendants, the default judgment was only against Rustic…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. HagermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KafeleOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re the Estate of GeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. David R. Nicholson, Builder, LLC v. JablonskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Zapata v. McHughNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Dysart v. Dragpipe SaloonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Acuity Insurance v. a Maxon and WeatherspoonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API