Smith v. Rustic Home Builders, LLC
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] We address the question whether an LLC must be represented by an attorney on appeal.
Background
[¶ 2.] Rustic Home Builders, LLC, contracted with Michael and Maggie Smith to provide the Smiths with specialty lumber products, services, and log home supplies for constructing a home north of Flan-dreau. Disagreements eventually led to a lawsuit. On May 1, 2007, the Smiths obtained a default judgment against Rustic for $174,963.01. Although Jay Driesen, Rustic’s manager, and Jared Driesen were listed as individual defendants, the default judgment was only against Rustic…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. HagermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Disciplinary Counsel v. KafeleOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re the Estate of GeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- David R. Nicholson, Builder, LLC v. JablonskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Zapata v. McHughNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Dysart v. Dragpipe SaloonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Acuity Insurance v. a Maxon and WeatherspoonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.