Legal Opinion

Arnold v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1944No. 28024. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. ChiEE Justice Fulton

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves a direct appeal to this court from a decree of the superior court of Cook county, declaring the Currency Exchange Ordinance of the city of Chicago illegal and void and permanently enjoining 'the city and its officials from enforcing such ordinance against the plaintiffs. The trial judge certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance was involved and that the public interest required a direct appeal to this court.

The plaintiffs (appellees,) comprising a considerable number of owners and operators of currency…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Dean Milk Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Bloomington v. WirrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Arms v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of Knox Ex Rel. Masterson v. Highlands, L.L.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Chicago Real Estate Board v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. The City of Chicago v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Father Basil's Lodge, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Ambassador East, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API