Ambassador East, Inc. v. City of Chicago
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simpson
Appellants, six hotels in the city of Chicago, seek to enjoin the city from enforcing its hotel rent control ordinance. The circuit court of Cook County dismissed their complaint for want of equity. The validity of a municipal ordinance being involved and the trial judge having certified that in his opinion the public interest requires an appeal to the Supreme Court, the case is brought here for review.
The ordinance in question declares and finds in substance that a serious public emergency exists in the housing of a considerable number of persons in the city of Chicago which has produced an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- City of Chicago v. M. & M. Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Bradley Supply Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Bloomington v. WirrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Chicago Real Estate Board v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- People Ex Rel. Brenza v. FleetwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Balmes v. Hiab-Foco, A.B.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.