Legal Opinion

The City of Chicago v. Barnett

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1949No. 31080. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Thompson

Upon a complaint filed by the city of Chicago in the municipal court, the appellant, Joseph Barnett, was tried, convicted and fined for violating a city ordinance requiring the licensing of insurance brokers. The complaint charged, and appellant’s answer admitted, that on April 9, 1948, Barnett conducted, operated and carried on the business of an insurance broker without first having obtained a license, in violation of chapter 113, section 10, of the Municipal Code of Chicago.

Chapter 113 of the Municipal Code of Chicago is an ordinance entitled “Brokers.” Section 10 of the ordinance provides…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Father Basil's Lodge, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. City of Bloomington v. WirrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Arms v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lycoming Fire Insurance v. RubinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. StockingIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Duhl v. Nash Realty Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Sawyer Realty Group, Inc. v. Jarvis Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lazzara v. Howard A. Esser, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Gothberg v. NemerovskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Pittway Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API