Legal Opinion

Arteman v. Clinton Community Unit School District No. 15

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 22, 2000No. 4-00-0383PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In March 1999, plaintiffs, Jeremy Arteman and his father, Steve Arteman (collectively, the Artemans), sued defendant, Clinton Community Unit School District No. 15 (School District), for injuries Jeremy sustained while roller blading during a high school physical education class. In April 1999, the School District filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to section 2 — 619(a)(9) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619(a)(9) (West 1998)). In July 1999, the trial court determined that the School District was immune from liability under section 3 — 108(a) of the Local…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lynch v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT DIST.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. West v. KirkhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arteman v. Clinton Community Unit School District No. 15Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Arteman v. CLINTON COM. UNIT SCHOOL DIST.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Arteman v. Clinton Community Unit School District No. 15Illinois Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API