Legal Opinion

Arteman v. CLINTON COM. UNIT SCHOOL DIST.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2002No. 90701Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

763 N.E.2d 756 (2002)

198 Ill.2d 475

261 Ill.Dec. 507

Jeremy ARTEMAN et al., Appellees,

v.

CLINTON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15, Appellant.

No. 90701.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

January 25, 2002.

Gregory Q. Hill, of Hughes, Hill & Tenney, L.L.C., Decatur, and Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago (Steven M. Puiszis, Stephen R. Swofford, of counsel), for appellant.

Garry Bryan, of Ray Moss & Associates, P.C., Clinton, for appellees.

Marilyn F. Johnson, Chicago (William A. Morgan, of counsel), for amici curiae Illinois Association of School Boards et al.

2Opinion of the Court · FitzgeraldJustice Fitzgerald

The plaintiffs, Jeremy Arteman and his father Steve…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API