Legal Opinion

Arteman v. Clinton Community Unit School District No. 15

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2002No. 90701 RelPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket No. 90701–Agenda 25–September 2001.

JEREMY ARTEMAN et al ., Appellees, v. CLINTON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 15, Appellant.

Opinion filed January 25, 2002.

2Opinion of the Court · FitzgeraldJustice Fitzgerald

The plaintiffs, Jeremy Arteman and his father Steve Arteman, filed a personal injury complaint against the Clinton Community Unit School District No. 15 (the School District), alleging, inter alia , that the School District was negligent in failing to provide roller-blade safety equipment for Jeremy’s physical education class. The School District moved to dismiss this complaint, asserting that it was entitled to immunity under…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API