In re Paige & Sexsmith Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Certiorari. The writ was issued at the instance of a resident creditor of the Paige & Sexsmith Lumber Co., to review an order of the district court for St. Louis county, denying the petitioner’s motion that the company’s assignee be required to add to the inventory filed tin that court a large amount of personal property, specified in the motion papers, and to increase his bond as assignee in proportion to >4he value of such personal property.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The Paige-Sexsmith Lumber Company was an association having its principal place of business in the state of Wisconsin. It assumed to be a corporation organized under the laws of that state, and was doing business as a corporation. It is claimed by the relator that the association was not legally incorporated. Two of the four members comprising the association resided in Wisconsin, the other two in Minnesota. The principal place of business was in Wisconsin. The company owned-a large amount of real and '.personal property in both states. In April, 1883, the company being in embarrassed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoyt v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Kelly v. . CrapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Ockerman v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hanford v. PaineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- Caskie v. WebsterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1851
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paxson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Memphis Sav. Bank v. HouchensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Fenton v. Edwards & JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Segnitz v. Garden City Banking & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Moore v. Land, Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.