Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Geer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2007No. 2007-0323PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This is an original action for a writ of prohibition to prevent a juvenile court judge from enforcing an order forbidding the media from photographing the face of an alleged delinquent and from entering any further proceedings unless and until all notice, evidentiary-hearing, and finding requirements are satisfied. Because Sup.R. 12(A) requires judges to permit the taking of photographs in court proceedings that are open to the public as provided by law, and the juvenile court did not hear evidence and argument and make the requisite findings in accordance with the applicable law before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. DonaldsonOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Geauga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Law Office of Montgomery County Public Defender v. RosencransOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. RonanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. WolffOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. HeathOhio Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API