State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
{¶ 1} Relator, the Cincinnati Enquirer (“Enquirer”), filed this original action in mandamus seeking the disclosure of recordings from cameras mounted on the dashboards (“dash-cams”) of two Ohio State Highway Patrol (“OSHP”) cars. Nearly two months later, respondents, the Ohio Department of Public Safety (“ODPS”) and its director John Born, released the requested recordings. Based on our review of the recordings, we hold that the Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, allowed ODPS to redact investigatory work product from one recording, but otherwise required ODPS to release the remainder.
{¶ 2} We…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Rogers v. Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Pike Cty. Coroner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State ex rel. Summers v. Fox (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Gannett GP Media, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. SafetyOhio Court of Claims · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.