Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Heath

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2009No. 2008-1250PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from the dismissal of an action for a writ of mandamus to compel common pleas court judges to vacate orders sealing certain records in a criminal case and to make the records available for inspection and copying in accordance with R.C. 149.43, the Public Records Act. Because the court of appeals erred in holding that appellant’s mandamus claim was moot and in determining that appellant was therefore not entitled to an award of attorney fees, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand for further proceedings.

Arrest and Municipal Court Proceedings

{¶ 2}…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Glasgow v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State ex rel. Doe v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. RonanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. WolffOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Miller v. Ohio Dept. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API