Legal Opinion

City of Harvey v. Fettig

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2001No. 20000185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] The City of Harvey has appealed from an order granting, in part, Kyle Fet-tig’s motion to suppress evidence. We dismiss the appeal because the City’s notice of appeal was not accompanied by a statement of the prosecuting attorney as required by N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5).

[¶ 2] In the early morning hours of November 5,1999, Harvey police officer Marc Balfour noticed a pickup driving without lights. He activated his overhead lights and the pickup stopped near one side of the street, but with part of the pickup still in the driving lane. Balfour approached the vehicle but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SchindeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. NortonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EmilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. GayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. G.K.T. v. T.L.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. EmilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API