Legal Opinion

State v. Norton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2000No. 20000045PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State has appealed an order granting, in part, Nevada Earl Norton’s motion to suppress evidence. We dismiss the appeal, because the State’s notice of appeal was not accompanied by the statutorily required statement of the prosecuting attorney.

[¶ 2] On October 2, 1999, a North Dakota Highway Patrol officer discovered a vehicle parked on 1-94 Exit 110. The officer asked Norton, who was in the driver’s seat of the parked vehicle, to get into the officer’s patrol car. After Norton was in the patrol car, the officer asked Norton for his driver’s license. Norton told…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. RambousekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EmilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. GayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Harvey v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Alonzo R. Perry v. Gary R. McCaughtry WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. EmilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API