Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2011No. 20100358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAKING, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Karleen Peterson’s motion to suppress. We dismiss the appeal because the prosecuting attorney’s statement did not satisfy the requirements of N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5).

I

[¶ 2] On April 7, 2010, officers entered Tucker Payne’s residence under the authority of Payne’s probationary conditions, which provided that Payne must submit his “person, place of i-esidence or vehicle, or any other property to which [he] has access, to search and seizure, at any time of the day or night, with or without a search warrant.” The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Mary Jane Johnson Rickey Joe BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. In Re the Detention of FowlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. United States v. Anthony T. CentracchioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Gregory McNeill United States of America v. Gregory McNeillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. G.K.T. v. T.L.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HorningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API