State v. Peterson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAKING, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Karleen Peterson’s motion to suppress. We dismiss the appeal because the prosecuting attorney’s statement did not satisfy the requirements of N.D.C.C. § 29-28-07(5).
I
[¶ 2] On April 7, 2010, officers entered Tucker Payne’s residence under the authority of Payne’s probationary conditions, which provided that Payne must submit his “person, place of i-esidence or vehicle, or any other property to which [he] has access, to search and seizure, at any time of the day or night, with or without a search warrant.” The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mary Jane Johnson Rickey Joe BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- In Re the Detention of FowlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- United States v. Anthony T. CentracchioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Gregory McNeill United States of America v. Gregory McNeillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- G.K.T. v. T.L.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HorningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016