Rose v. Rundall
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered October 26, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
There was a contract in writing made by the parties on December 1, 1911, wherein appellant agreed *423to sell, and respondent agreed to purchase, a tract of real estate in King county for $3,000. The sum of ten dollars was paid by the vendee in cash, and it was agreed that the balance should be paid in three equal annual installments of $997 each, on December 1, 1912, 1913, and 1914, with annual interest at seven per cent on the deferred amounts. Respondent defaulted on the installment due December 1, 1912, and this action was brought on November 8, 1913, to recover that installment and interest…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Stewart & Holmes Drug Co. v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Copple v. AigeltingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Bach v. . TuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Barquin v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Stevens v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Portner v. TannerWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Eilers Music House v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.