Legal Opinion

Nason v. Lingle

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1904No. L.A. No. 1286PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Specific performance of an alleged contract for the exchange of certain real property. Defendants demurred to the third amended verified complaint for insufficiency of facts and for uncertainty. The court sustained the demurrer as to the first ground and overruled it as to the second. Plaintiffs declined to amend, and judgment passed for defendants, from which plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. The complaint alleges title in plaintiff Ada Ward Nason to certain described land situated in San Diego County, California, on or about March 1, 1901; that defendant Donald…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Green v. CovillaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Salfield v. Sutter County Land Improvement & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hay v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hays v. SteigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Haas v. GreenwaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Copple v. AigeltingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bird v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API