Reynolds Boat Co. v. City of Haverhill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
In this action of tort for negligence there were three substantially identical counts brought respectively by Reynolds Boat Company, Inc., Kenneth Reynolds, and Teresa Reynolds.
Each count alleged that the city “promise[)d3” to and undertook to provide water for the plaintiff’s use and “undertook to provide the plaintiff with adequate water to service hydrants in the area for whatever use the said hydrant should be put, that the defendant knew that the water service either it’s [sfc] conduits or pumping facilities were inadequate for providing the plaintiff with proper protection in the event…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Village of KeesevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Tainter v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Sloper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Harrington v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Stang v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Cyran v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- New England Mobile Book Fair, Inc. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Bandanza v. Town of NorwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Gans Tire Sales Co. v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.