Legal Opinion

Bandanza v. Town of Norwood

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 7, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After the plaintiffs’ opening statement in this action of tort for personal injuries and consequential damages, the judge directed a verdict for the defendant on each of four counts in the declaration, and the plaintiffs excepted. The claim is that the defendant’s contractor excavated a street to lay water pipes, that the defendant put gravel over the excavated area, that over a six months’ period stones and gravel were strewn over adjacent sidewalks and lawns, and that a boy in the neighborhood picked up a stone and threw it, permanently impairing the sight of the left eye of the five year…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Horan v. Inhabitants of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Smith v. Eagle Cornice & Skylight WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Geary v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Reynolds Boat Co. v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roderick v. Brandy Hill Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  2. Jesionek v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Fithian v. ZofchakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Verge v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  5. Fithian v. ZofchakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API