Bandanza v. Town of Norwood
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
After the plaintiffs’ opening statement in this action of tort for personal injuries and consequential damages, the judge directed a verdict for the defendant on each of four counts in the declaration, and the plaintiffs excepted. The claim is that the defendant’s contractor excavated a street to lay water pipes, that the defendant put gravel over the excavated area, that over a six months’ period stones and gravel were strewn over adjacent sidewalks and lawns, and that a boy in the neighborhood picked up a stone and threw it, permanently impairing the sight of the left eye of the five year…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Horan v. Inhabitants of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Smith v. Eagle Cornice & Skylight WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Geary v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Reynolds Boat Co. v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roderick v. Brandy Hill Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Jesionek v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Fithian v. ZofchakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Verge v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Fithian v. ZofchakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000