Legal Opinion

Gans Tire Sales Co. v. City of Chelsea

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 6, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After the plaintiffs in these consolidated actions had completed their opening statements a judge of the Superior Court allowed the defendant city of Chelsea’s motion for directed verdicts. This is an appeal from the resulting judgments entered in each action.

The facts alleged in the opening statements of the plaintiffs are as follows. On May 22,1974, a fire broke out at the American Barrel Company, Inc., in Chelsea. As the fire spread through the American Barrel plant radiant heat from the flames caused damage to, or destruction of, the plaintiffs’ buildings and personal property. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Sloper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Cole Drug Co. of Massachusetts v. BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Nashville Trust Co. v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Co. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API