Legal Opinion

Liles v. Damon Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2008No. CC 033086; CA A129113; SC S054734PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action under ORS 646A.400 to 646A.418, commonly known as Oregon’s Lemon Law, 1 seeking replacement of a motor home that they had purchased. The issue on review concerns the proper interpretation of ORS 646A.402, which we quote below in full. Under that statute, a statutory remedy is “available to a consumer” if, among other things, the manufacturer of a motor vehicle has received “direct written notification” from the consumer and “has had an opportunity to correct the alleged defect.” ORS 646A.402(3).

After a trial, the trial court found that plaintiffs had satisfied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Liles v. Damon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Evergreen West Business Center, LLC v. EmmertOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Evergreen West Business Center, LLC v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Bonds v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API