Legal Opinion

Luka v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 2011No. 081115880; A141388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The issue in this case, which the Supreme Court remanded to us for reconsideration in light of Bonds v. Farmers Ins. Co., 349 Or 152, 240 P3d 1086 (2010), is whether plaintiff “formally instituted arbitration proceedings” as required in order to toll the statute of limitations, ORS 742.504(12)(a), 1 on her uninsured motorist claim. In Bonds, the Supreme Court held that, “to ‘formally institute’ arbitration proceedings, an insured or an insurer must expressly communicate to the other party that the initiating party offers to arbitrate or otherwise commits to the arbitration process.” Bonds,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bonds v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bonds v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atilano v. BryonSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API