Legal Opinion

State v. Thorpe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. 040266BFE; A128450PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, ORS 165.017. He assigns error to the trial court’s order of restitution, arguing that the court did not have authority to order restitution for three separate counterfeit checks when defendant was convicted of and admitted to possessing only a single forged instrument. On review for errors of law, we remand for resentencing.

Initially, defendant and five codefendants were charged in a 17-count indictment alleging multiple counts including computer crime, ORS 164.377;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. KappelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. HowettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. KammeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API