Legal Opinion

State v. Kirkland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 2015No. 12CR2484FE; A153365PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

After a guilty plea, defendant was convicted of first-degree theft, ORS 164.055. On appeal, defendant challenges the portion of the judgment that ordered him to pay restitution to the victim in the amount of $1,405. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by ordering restitution because the state failed to establish that defendant “admitted” to “other criminal conduct” that caused the victim’s damages. ORS 137.106; ORS 137.103(4)(a), (b); ORS 137.103(1). We conclude that defendant pleaded guilty to conduct that the trial court could reasonably find caused $1,405 worth of economic damages…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. SeggermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. AkermanTillamook County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API