Legal Opinion

State v. Howett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 16, 2002No. 0010-38083; A114089PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals her sentence for theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. Defendant assigns error to the amount of restitution imposed by the trial court. We review sentencing decisions for errors of law, ORS 138.222(4), and remand for resentencing.

Defendant was indicted for, and pleaded guilty to, theft in the first degree for money that she stole from her employer. The indictment charged defendant as follows:

“THEFT IN THE FIRST DEGREE
“The said defendant, on or between October 03, 2000, and October 07, 2000 in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon, did unlawfully and knowingly commit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. SeggermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API