Legal Opinion

First National Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. Bassett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 27, 1938No. 28440PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the district court of Tulsa county, made in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, allowing defendant in error’s claim for compensation as attorney for a former guardian of an Indian minor. Plereafter the parties will be referred to as “claimant” and “guardian.”

In November, 1912, 'S. B. .Nelson was appointed guardian of Millie Naharkey, a Creek minor, who reached majority June 13, 1922. Five days prior to her becoming of age, Nelson, with the approval of the county court, entered into a written contract with claimant, employing him to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In Re Estate of TalomaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Neff v. Willmott, Roberts LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Jones v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Morton v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Landsing Diversified Properties-II v. First National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Western Real Estate Fund, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Succession of WallaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API