Legal Opinion
Neff v. Willmott, Roberts Looney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1935No. 23699PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Seminole county. Plaintiff in error, L. E. Neff, was defendant below. Defendants in error, Willmott, Roberts & Looney, were plaintiffs in the trial court. The paities will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.
In July, 1925, plaintiffs obtained an attorneys’ contract from Robert Hully, Winey Harjo. and Alex Harjo, to represent the three above-named persons, who were Indians, in an effort to recover certain inherited interests in real estate. The contract of employment provided for a contingent fee of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schonwald v. RagainsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. KinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Walker v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., an English Corporation v. F. Carroll FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Expertise, Inc., D/B/A Champion Warehouse Distributors v. Aetna Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.