Legal Opinion

Morton v. Thomason

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1930No. 19412PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, C.

The plaintiff’s petition was in two. counts, the first one alleging: That one Washie Riley, an incompetent, through his guardian, M. M. Thomason, claimed an interest as an heir in the allotted lands of three certain full-blood Creek Indians; that the title to these lands was involved in numerous suits in Creek, Seminole, and Hughes counties, Okla., in which the guardian was a party at interest either as plaintiff or defendant; that in undertaking to establish said incompetent’s rights in said allotments it was necessary to spend certain sums of money in interviewing witnesses,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allison v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Arthur v. CoyneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Provins v. LoviSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  4. Cavanagh v. JohannessenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Jones v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Badgwell v. LairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. OtwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Tate v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Crescent Oil Co. v. BrumleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API