Legal Opinion

Milliken & Co. v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8210SC1318PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

On 26 October 1981 claimant filed a claim for unemployment benefits with her employer, Milliken & Company. She alleged that she quit her job as a shift manager on 14 October 1981 because of physical stress. An adjudicator determined that claimant was not disqualified for benefits under G.S. 96-14(1). This statute provides that an individual shall be disqualified if at the time his claim is filed he is “unemployed because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the employer.” The adjudicator found that claimant quit work involuntarily due to health reasons.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. HixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gibson v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re GeorgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Eason v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Ray v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Lewis v. GatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hoke v. Brinlaw Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API