Legal Opinion

In re George

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1979No. 784SC584PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The appellant contends the evidence did not support the Commission’s finding that Noah George was “able to work.” G.S. 96-13 provides:

*492(a) An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week only if the Commission finds that —(1) He has registered for work at and thereafter has continued to report at an employment office in accordance with such regulations as the Commission may prescribe;(2) He has made a claim for benefits in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 96-15(a);(3) He is able to work, and is available for work ....

Appellant argues…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Milliken & Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hoke v. Brinlaw Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API