Legal Opinion

Cater v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1998No. 1997-1261PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 24.] CATER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, APPELLEE. [Cite as Cater v. Cleveland,

1998-Ohio-421.] Municipal corporations—Tort liability—Operation of a municipal swimming pool is subject to the exceptions to immunity set forth in former R.C. 2744.02(B) and to the available defenses enumerated in R.C. 2744.03. The operation of a municipal swimming pool, although defined as a governmental function in R.C. 2744.01(C)(2)(u), is subject to the exceptions to immunity set forth in former R.C. 2744.02(B) and to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pelletier v. Campbell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Greene Cty. Agricultural Soc. v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ryll v. Columbus Fireworks Display Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Harp v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API