Legal Opinion

W. X. Huber Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 16, 1940No. C. D. 370PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

In these suits against the United States the plaintiff seeks to recover the duty assessed by the collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles on certain water chestnuts which the appraiser reported were spoiled at the time of his official examination, Protest 833961-G contains additional claims relating to beans and bean sauce, but the claims as to such merchandise were abandoned at the trial and are hereby overruled.

The specific claim in protest 833961-G is that the duty on the water chestnuts should be assessed at 50 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 774 of the Tariff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. LippmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. United States v. HabichtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrison Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Schnell v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  3. Protest 49309-K of Sanzone Palmisano Co.United States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Protest 850758-G of W. X. Huber Co.United States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Protest 958373-G of W. X. Huber Co.United States Customs Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API