Legal Opinion

McKesson & Robbins (Inc.) v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 30, 1923No. 2220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

An importation, invoiced as 50 cases of opium, arrived May 9, 1920. May 15,1920, it was transferred to public store as unpermitted opium.

The appraiser’s report to the collector shows case No. 40 ‘ ‘Empty, in bad order, not corded and sealed, evidence of robbery, gross weight twenty-nine pounds.”

The report of the discharging inspector, under date of August 17, 192Í, is as follows:

* * * As discharging inspectors of the S/S Blair, from Constantinople, arrival of May 9, 1920, we have to report regarding reference #1559 covering one case marked W T 40 One Case Opium, unpermitted. The same was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LippmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKesson & Robbins (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Dent, Allcroft & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API