Legal Opinion

Zell v. Ohio Superintendent of Real Estate

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1992No. 60365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Corrigan, Presiding Judge.

The Superintendent of the Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Real Estate (“superintendent”), appeals from the judgment of the trial court which granted Thomas and Elaine Zell’s application for recovery from the Real Estate Recovery Fund. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

I

On April 21, 1989, the Zells (“applicants”) obtained a default judgment against real estate salesman Nancy Dickens, in connection with the execution of a lease with an option to purchase their property. Thereafter, on August 17, 1989, the applicants commenced this action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. L.A. & D., Inc. v. Board of Lake County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ball v. RitenourOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Krejci v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bedow v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Auer v. PaliathOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API